New Delhi: The financial irregularities which would have been engaged in the conduct of season 2 of the IPL in South Africa in the 2009 APRMAY in APRMAY 2009 have returned to haunt the CLICKET control council in India (BCCI) with the president of the IPL, Lalit Modi, urging the Supreme Court to ask the Board of Directors of Cricket to pay RS 10 penalty on its behavior of the Integration Directorate (ED). Modi blamed the board of directors with all its decisions and its responsibilities related to the League.IPL-2 was organized in South Africa in April-May 2009 (ended on May 24) after the Union’s Interior Ministry, citing Lok Sabha’s surveys expressed its inability to ensure the security of T-20 competitions across the country.The urgency, during an investigation, noted financial irregularities in the conduct of the IPL-2, and said that the BCCI and its deputies violated the exchange rules and carried out transactions without informing the RBI. Although a case of violation of FEMA was filed in November 2011, the questions rested there until April 2015, when Ed decided to start the judgment procedure, and 11 opinions were served in BCCI and its officials for personal hearings.In the record opinions of the show, Ed accused the BCCI of having violated the directives of RBI and the rules of the FEMA by putting RS 243 drinks in the South Africa Cricket (CSA), allegedly without the required authorization of the central banker. These funds were made by BCCI to the CSA to “respond to the expenses incurred by them on behalf of BCCI for the driving of the IPL” of its bank account to the State Banque de Travancore, Jaipur branch.“The instructions required for the transfer of funds for the first two funds were given by the BCCI to their bank on March 28, 2009, which was before the signing of the agreement with the CSA. Likewise, the last two funds were made after the tournament concluded, including the last remittor of 1.03,62,799 has been carried out for 15 months after the conclusion of the Tournament. note.The ED probe also revealed payments of RS 44 crossed by BCCI which remained “unnoticed and unexplained by BCCI”, resulting in taxation. These payments were made on an alleged “proxy” account maintained by the BCCI in South Africa in violation of FEMA rules, according to the case procedure.
