One of the most friendly cricket players in the game, but Rohit Sharma was not immune to criticism by experts, former cricket players or journalists. The captain of India Odi has even been part of certain ardent press conferences, in particular since the management of the role of a skipper in the national team. In the last phase of his career, Rohit underlined a great change which he saw in the way in which cricket activities are managed. In an interview, the 38 -year -old man pointed out how “Masala” took over the “pure cricket” in modern times.
During an interview with Vimal Kumar, Rohit underlined the big difference between the type of comment he sees in India compared to what he sees in Australia, calling the first “disappointing”.
“We see everything, we are talking about. Sometimes, when we watch the match on television, the kind of things that commentators are talking about is very different from the type of comments you see in Australia. Here, it’s so disappointing. I am very honest. It seems that they only want to target a player and talk about him. It is very disappointing,” said Rohit in the interview.
The veteran striker, who recently left Test Cricket, said that criticizing a player on a bad form is perfectly understandable, but commentators should know where to trace the line.
“There are a lot of people who like the game. They don’t want” Masala “, they want to watch cricket. At the time of today, we put a lot of Masala in the game. There are also cricket lovers who do not want to hear about personal stuff. Just because you have the right to speak. Cups deserve great respect.
Rohit even believes that in today’s era, the criticism “focused on the agenda” resumed real feedback on the performance or non-performance of a player.
“Yes, there have been things where it took place in our hands. We did not do well in some cases, where we deserve criticism. No problem. We have lost against New Zealand at home, we deserve criticism. But there is a way to criticize someone. Today, he concluded the subject.
Rohit also said that he did not believe that he cannot defend himself for criticism, because “attacking” is what is good.
“To manage criticism, is important in the life of an sportsman. I understand this. But, it is not necessary. On the ground, not outside,” he said.
Subjects mentioned in this article
