Queen Camilla would have “stayed outside” of the rift of Prince Harry and King Charles

Sources have also recently shared that Charles lacks confidence advisers who can encourage reconciliation, while Prince William would oppose the repair of links.

Prince Harry has since been urged by royal commentators to keep a “worthy silence”, warning his public comments of damage.

Queen Camilla avoids growing tensions between King Charles and her separate son, Prince Harry.

According to the initiates of the palace who spoke to People magazineThe 77 -year -old queen “remains outside” the current family quarrel, especially after being criticized in the explosive replacement of Harry “of spare”.

In the book, the Duke of Sussex described his mother-in-law as “dangerous” and “the villain”, accusing him of having fled the stories to the media to protect his public image.

In addition, sources suggest that the fracture between Harry and his family recently intensified as a result of a Bbc Interview in which Harry’s remarks were considered to be damaging to any remaining confidence between him and his sick father.

Although the interview was not conceived as a direct attack, the royal commentator Valentine Low noted: “He would be considered one”. She added that “it makes Charles to reach out even more difficult.”

The expert Royal Sally Bedell Smith also noted that Charles and Prince William “do not trust Harry and Meghan with all kinds of confidential conversation”.

Catherine Mayer, author of “Charles: The Heart of A King”, echoes this feeling, warning that “if you have this level of violation in a family, and you are distant, you run this risk every day to have something unfathomable to manage.”

According to PeopleCharles is not supposed to take the first step to reconcile with Harry largely because he is not surrounded by advisers who push for reconciliation.

The Royal Valentine Low commentator shared that the monarch does not have a “good angel in his ear to say:” Be a good father and take the first step. “”

William, who, after being strongly criticized in Harry’s memories, would not be very interested in repairing their relationship.

Sources suggest that the Prince of Wales is firmly against efforts to reconnect.

Meanwhile, the Royal Commentator Joe Little believes that Harry’s chances repair his fractured relationship with the royal family could move away, and suggest that the Duke of Sussex would be better served by keeping a “dignified silence”.

Speaking to PA News agency via MirrorLittle, editor -in -chief of Majesty Magazine, described Harry’s remarks on Charles’s health in the Bbc The interview as “quite alarming”, especially given the admission of Harry that he has not spoken to his father for some time.

“From what Harry says, despite the admission he has not spoken to his father for some time, I thought it sent a little mixed message,” said Little. “Does Harry suggest that the king is not as good as we have to believe?”

Joe has not criticized Harry’s continuing trend to publicly disseminate the grievances rather than resolving them in private.

“I think that for someone who seeks reconciliation with his father, his brother and his family, his royal family as a whole, I think the very last thing he should have done was to speak publicly,” said Little.

He added that Harry’s repeated public disclosure made it difficult for the royal family to become their self -confidence.

“There is a lot to gain by maintaining a worthy silence-unfortunately, as we know by past events, it is not the way of doing things from Harry,” he noted.

Few concluded by suggesting that “perhaps the lessons have simply not been learned from previous occasions where silence would also have been the best thing to maintain”.