Eng vs ind: Stuart Broad Noms Two daring changes India should consider for the Edgbaston test
Ancient England pacer Stuart Broad criticized IndiaSelection of the team for the first test against England in Headingley, calling it a significant tactical error. India, despite the publication of five centuries out of two rounds, lost the match of five counters after England hunted a record target of 371 points.
Stuart Broad underlines India’s selection error in Headingley
According to Broad, one of the main reasons for the failure of India was the decision to finish Shardul Thakur Instead of filter of the wrist with left arms Kuldeep Yadav. Speaking on the podcast for the love of cricket, Broad stressed that the conditions for Edgbaston and the traditional vulnerability of England against the rotation of the wrist made Kuldeep an ideal option.
The Bowling attack of India during the first test lacked control in crucial moments, especially during the continuation of the race in England. While Shardul Thakur Offer of the depth of shot, his bowling was lacking in penetration and the ability of Kuldeep to bring threads of varieties and deception with his wrist rotation was sorely missed.
Broad believed that Kuldeep’s inclusion would have given India a strategic advantage, in particular as the attack approach of England under Ben Stokes And Brendon McCullumFamous nicknamed “Bazball”, has shown signs of fighting quality wrist rotation. Broad’s suggestion aligns with previous analyzes of Kuldeep’s efficiency, especially when associated with a high pressure rhythm attack led by Jasprit Bumrah.
“I think they tolerated their team badly, if I am honest. Kuldeep Yadav should have played in the place of Shardul Thakur. Especially with the kind of pitch and the known struggle of England against the wrist rotation, Kuldeep could have made a big difference”, “ Said Broad on “For the love of cricket”.
Read also: Rohit Sharma reveals the unknown hero behind the triumph of the T20 World Cup from India 2024
Broad supports another star player for Edgbaston if Bumrah is rested
As part of the second test at Edgbaston, Broad floated another idea: if Bumrah is rested as part of the India Work Chart Management Plan, the team should consider making its debut in sewing the left arm Arshdeep Singh. Broad argued that Arshdeep’s natural angle and ability to swing the ball early could be a precious asset in English conditions.
While Prasidh Krishna Has shown signs of improvement in the second rounds, Broad estimated that Indian attack as aness did not have the bite and consistency necessary to break partnerships and maintain the pressure. Arshdeep, who took 66 counters in 21 first class games at an average of 30.37, could bring an essential left -wing variation and variation of left arms. However, competition from Akash Deep can complicate selection decisions, in particular with India which now hangs out in the series and under pressure to bounce.
“If Bumrah will be rested in Edgbaston, I would be tempted to call on Arshdeep Singh. The angle of the left arm and its ability to swing the ball early could offer something different to the Bowling attack in India. Although Prasidh Krishna has improved in the second round, the attack did not lack control and threat of Wcom. It only takes a few adjustments rather than large changes, ” Broad concluded.
Read also: Eng vs ind: 3 players who can replace Jasprit Bumrah in the second test in Edgbaston
