Apple shares an increase after the decision in the case of Google Antitrust

Apple Actions increased by more than 3% of prolonged exchanges on Tuesday after a federal judge ruled that Alphabet Can continue to make payments to preload Google search on the iPhone.

Although Apple was not part of the monopoly research trial, the judge was considering appeals that would prevent Google from paying billions a year to Apple to be the default search engine on the Safari browser on iPhones, Macs and Ipads.

“Google will not be forbidden to make payments or offer another consideration to the distribution partners for the preloading or placement of Google Search, Chrome or its Genai products,” wrote Friend Mehta in his decision.

“The reduction of Google payments will almost certainly impose substantial damage – in certain cases, paralyzing – downstream for distribution partners, related markets and consumers, who advise a large payment prohibition,” continued the decision.

The historic affair focused on domination by Google in the general research market, Google’s violations on the Sherman law and the obstacles to the entry that the search engine has erected.

However, the judge said that Google would be prohibited to enter or maintain “any exclusive contract” linked to preloading its search engine or key applications on devices, specifying that Google cannot group its Android services with Google Search or Returned Condition Share agreements on the acceptance of other Google applications or services.

The decision indicates that the Apple Agreement with Google is the default search engine was “exclusive” because it established Google as the default ready -to -use search engine.

But while Mehta has brought restrictions on Google making payments to ensure that its products receive an exclusive distribution, these payments have not been fully prohibited, leaving the possibility that the two companies can conclude a new agreement. Apple, for example, could offer a “choice screen” of the search engine when rooted, analysts previously speculated.

Neither Apple nor Google immediately responds for a request for comments.

The United States Ministry of Justice filed its complaint against Google in 2020, alleging that Google had kept its general research share by erecting solid obstacles to challengers, such as its default research agreements. The Washington American district court judged last August that Google had violated article 2 of the Sherman law. Eddy Cue, main vice-president of Apple software and services, testified on behalf of Google on potential remedies.

Tuesday’s file was the first time that the judge has detailed his appeal projects.

Analysts previously said that this could take years before Apple is forced to make changes in response to a Google follows. Google said it would appeal the decision and that analysts say that any appeal trial could last up to two years. Google can also call on the appeal trial, and the Supreme Court can choose to throw it once the calls are exhausted.

While Google contracts companies such as Samsung and Browser-Maker Mozilla to be the default search engine on their platforms, the most important and most important agreement “default agreement” concerns Apple. Google paid all partners 26 billion dollars in total to all the default search engine in 2021, according to the documents discussed in court.

Google has paid because it surrounds the traffic of the 1 billion Apple iPhone users to its search engine, and income is essential for the growth of Apple’s activity activity, that investors love because it is so much more profitable than equipment sales.

In addition to license payments, Apple says that it uses Google because it is the best search engine and its priority is to offer the best tools to its customers.

Apple also has options if it cannot make Google the default search engine. Earlier this year, for example, Apple’s Cue declared to the court as a Google witness that the iPhone manufacturer also planned to add IA search engines as options to its software.

“The testimony of CIEU establishes that the high income sharing payments of Google have dissuaded Apple to try to capture all the advertising rents which circulate in the default research box of the Safari browser,” the judge wrote in the Tuesday file.

Google Apple’s revenues are reported in its finances as advertising income, which is reported as part of the company’s service activity, which also includes Applecare guarantees, cloud services such as iCloud and digital content such as Apple applications and music.

WATCH: The federal judge reigns that Google does not have to exceed Chrome